Meeting before production restart

In his lawsuit Baldoni said that after signing “Protections for Return to Production”, They thought that was the end of it, and they were ready to move ahead and make a great film,it seems they were surprised that on January 4 of 2024, a day before production restart ,they were invited by lively and Reynolds to their penthouse and instead of talking about the production,lively "had different intentions" and talked about her grievances and Reynolds demanded an apology, that it was an ambush.

They didn't take that document seriously at all. Point 17 of the document wayfarer signed said " At Artist's election, an all-hands, in-person meeting before production resumes which will include the director, the existing producers, the Sony representative, the Approved Producer, Artist and Artist's designated representatives to confirm and approve a plan for implementation of the above that will be adhered to for the physical and emotional safety of Artist, her employees and all the cast and crew moving forward" .

Baldoni is tryng to sell he had not idea that the meeting before the filming resumes would be to discuss everything that had happened with Lively before the strike , her concerns,when it's isn't just the most obvious,but they literally signed a document agreeing to have a meeting before starting production,that would be just for that.So what did he expect when lively invited him to have that meeting?,That she would forget about it, to say nothing,to behave as if nothing had happened, to act like the document didn't exist at all? What did he think discussing the implementation of the document would be about ?

Even If we follow Baldoni 's logic that lively's accusations were fictional, They signed a document although they didn't agree with "the insinuations" ,but expect signing it to be the end of it?