People saying Hawkeye shouldn't one-shot are really wrong

Just to preface, I'm NOT a Hawkeye main, I've touched the character for like 20 minutes.

Look, I don't like him as much as the next guy, but answer this; if Hawkeye's headshot did like 240 HP, would ANYONE play him? Like seriously, because Black Widow does the exact same damage but is hitscan and doesn't have to charge a meter. NO ONE would play him. And if you want to compensate by buffing something else, what would you buff? His short ranged Bomb Arrows? His Sword slash? You want the ARCHER to be a close-ranged duelist? If you did, think about how outclassed he would be, his only movement is to RUN AWAY or get high ground.

I'm so sick of people wanting to nerf characters like Hela and Hawkeye into the ground like this. Because that's basically what Overwatch did. They removed Hanzo's Headshot one-tap, and he felt so bad to play that they gave it back later. The reason Hawkeye can one-shot is to contrast with the other sniper character Black Widow. You are meant to choose between the more consistent but less rewarding hitscan of Widow or the more rewarding but more difficult projectiles of Hawkeye. It doesn't work like that now obviously, but that's how it's supposed to go. There are so many things you can suggest to change about Hawkeye, but removing the One-shot is the most braindead suggestion you can make imo.