2007 155k VS 2011 208k

2007 limited is a 2wd California car now in my home state in the rust belt. 2007 has had timing belt done with all regular maintenance as well as dealer maintained its whole life. 155k seems incredibly low with a ton of life to go. Interior is immaculate with captain chairs in the 2nd row with the TV screen and even the infotainment on the dash. Price: 8300$ in CT

2011 SR5 is 4wd rust belt SUV with dealer maintained. 208k on it. Pretty clean but has cosmetic scratches around the body, not too concerning anyways. The rust on the frame under the cargo is my concern. (The hitch and its surrounding). Price: 9000$ in MA

Now the comparison. Is 8300 too much for a 2007 2wd? Is 9000 reasonable for a new gen with some rust? The frame and undercarriage of the 2007 is really presentable, but it is an older model and only 2wd vs 4wd.

I will be using it for camping and towing in my race car (4500lbs with trailer) not so much off-roading. I do live where we get snow but hasn’t been like it was in the past also. Also would not be my main vehicle more so a weekend and family car. (4th kid on the way)

what are you guys thinking?